Go to content

লোকসংস্কৃতি বনাম ভদ্রলোক সংস্কৃতি: উনিশ শতকের বাংলায় এক দ্বন্দ্বমূলক পাঠ - International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies (IJHSSS)

Next Issue
31 March, 2026


ISSN: 2349-6959 (Online) 2349-6711 (Print)
International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies (IJHSSS)
A Peer-Reviewed Indexed Bi-lingual Bi-Monthly Research Journal
ID: 10.29032
Curating Knowledge, Cultivating Thought: Celebrating 10 Years
Skip menu
Paper Submission

Volume-XII, Issue-I, January 2026
লোকসংস্কৃতি বনাম ভদ্রলোক সংস্কৃতি: উনিশ শতকের বাংলায় এক দ্বন্দ্বমূলক পাঠ
দীপক ঘোষ, স্বাধীন গবেষক, পশ্চিমবঙ্গ, ভারত
Received: 15.01.2026
Accepted: 26.01.2026
Published Online: 31.01.2026
Page No:
DOI: 10.29032/ijhsss.vol.12.issue.01W.178
Folk Culture versus Bhadralok Culture: A Dialectical Reading of Nineteenth-Century Bengal
Dipak Ghosh, Independent Researcher, West Bengal, India
ABSTRACT
Nineteenth-century Bengal was a complex phase of social, cultural, and intellectual transformation under colonial rule. During this period, the spread of Western education, the English language, print technology, and urbanization led to the emergence of a new English-educated middle class, historically known as bhadralok society. This bhadralok culture sought to establish itself as the bearer of modernity, rationality, moral reform, and social progress. In contrast, the long-established folk culture of rural Bengal—comprising folk songs, folk theatre, folk religion, rituals, and oral traditions—represented a different cultural logic and social reality.
    This paper analyzes the relationship between folk culture and bhadralok culture in nineteenth-century Bengal as a “dialectical,” “unequal power-laden,” and “class-based cultural process.” It demonstrates that bhadralok dominance was not limited to matters of taste, morality, or reform; rather, it functioned as a form of cultural power closely linked to education, language, knowledge production, and the colonial state. Through print culture, newspapers, and literary language, bhadralok society attempted to marginalize folk culture by labeling it as backward, primitive, and “inferior.”
    However, the paper also argues that folk culture was not entirely erased. Instead, through various processes of resistance, adaptation, and negotiation, folk culture sustained its presence within the space of modernity. Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of Subaltern Studies, cultural hegemony, and colonial modernity, this study seeks to reassess the cultural history of nineteenth-century Bengal from a new and critical perspective.
Keywords: Folk culture, bhadralok culture, nineteenth-century Bengal, cultural conflict, cultural hegemony, colonial modernity, class and culture
Designed by:
Dr. Bishwajit Bhattacharjee
IJHSSS
(C) Scholar Publications. All Right Reserved
Hit Counter
Back to content